🔗 Share this article

When the Russian President visited the South Asian nation in the previous decade, the international order was markedly different. The brief visit, limited by the pandemic, centered around discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two nations.

Months later, the full-scale invasion of its neighbor would turn the Russian leader into a figure of international condemnation, greatly limiting his overseas engagements.

Furthermore, that period preceded a major change in US-India relations, marked by inflammatory rhetoric and the introduction of substantial import duties.

"In this context, the importance of Putin's journey to engage with the Indian PM is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a rejection of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Both Nations

The high-level meeting occurs at a crucial time. President Putin arrives following dismissing recent peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to claimed gains by Russian forces.

"From Moscow's perspective, the key significance of this engagement is its simple happening," stated a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to something resembling routine global diplomacy."

From Delhi's standpoint, the stakes are even higher. The country faces a difficult international environment, characterized by a less engaged United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a public commentary criticizing Russia's peace efforts. This elicited a sharp rebuke from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate interference.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond dates back to the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West before a recent shift.

For years, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. Yet, in the wake of stalled diplomacy, accusations mounted, leading to economic penalties and a significant downturn in US-India ties.

"In response, India has reverted to its default strategy of 'hedging'," noted a strategic analyst. "This demonstrates to the US that it has other choices and is waiting to see how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is geography. "Beijing continues to be the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a counterweight against China," the analyst stated.

The strengthening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an excessively close bond between its adversary and its traditional ally.

This apprehension has also spurred India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, decreasing its reliance on Russian equipment from a dominant share to under 40% in the past few years.

"India will attempt to strike a balance: buy sufficient Russian arms to keep the partnership alive, but avoid so dependent that a supply disruption would cripple its defenses," the analyst concluded.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced economic cooperation is expected to be a key agenda item. President Putin has publicly emphasized plans to take cooperation with India to a "qualitatively new level", in spite of Western sanctions.

The issue of crude oil purchases remains central. While the Indian government has stated to keep buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of US energy.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in economic cooperation but insisted it would continue uninterrupted. The official downplayed the impact of sanctions, claiming they would cause only "insignificant" and "brief" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

As talks proceed, the issue of Ukraine is expected to be mentioned primarily through India's standard call for dialogue and peace.

"While the Indian leader has access to all parties, India lacks the necessary leverage to significantly influence the conflict," the analyst said. "Aside from encouraging talks, its capacity to make a difference is limited."

In the end, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pragmatic strategic interest," driven by national interest in a volatile world.