🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and support services to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty requires specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in other member states